Filed: Mar. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA , District Judge . On February 26, 2018, the magistrate judge filed a report in which he recommended that the Court dismiss as moot petitioner Mesmer Hagos's 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 9). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file objections within 14 days. (Doc. 9, pp. 2-3). To date, no party has filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 1 A district court "may ac
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA , District Judge . On February 26, 2018, the magistrate judge filed a report in which he recommended that the Court dismiss as moot petitioner Mesmer Hagos's 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 9). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file objections within 14 days. (Doc. 9, pp. 2-3). To date, no party has filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 1 A district court "may acc..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, District Judge.
On February 26, 2018, the magistrate judge filed a report in which he recommended that the Court dismiss as moot petitioner Mesmer Hagos's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 9). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file objections within 14 days. (Doc. 9, pp. 2-3). To date, no party has filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.1
A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A district court reviews legal conclusions in a report de novo and reviews for plain error factual findings to which no objection is made. Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749 (11th Cir. 1988); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed. Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006).2
Having reviewed the record in this case, including the report and recommen-dation, the Court finds no misstatements of law in the report and no plain error in the magistrate judge's description of the relevant facts. Therefore, the Court adopts the magistrate judge's report and accepts his recommendation.
The Court will enter a separate final order consistent with this memorandum opinion.
DONE and ORDERED.
