Andrews v. Boyd, 2:15-cv-00045-KOB-SGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180328739
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE , Chief District Judge . On March 1, 2018, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending that the court treat the defendants' special reports as motions for summary judgment and further recommending that the court grant the motions. (Doc. 48). No party has filed any objections. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's repo
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE , Chief District Judge . On March 1, 2018, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending that the court treat the defendants' special reports as motions for summary judgment and further recommending that the court grant the motions. (Doc. 48). No party has filed any objections. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's repor..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KARON OWEN BOWDRE, Chief District Judge.
On March 1, 2018, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending that the court treat the defendants' special reports as motions for summary judgment and further recommending that the court grant the motions. (Doc. 48). No party has filed any objections.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS her recommendation. Accordingly, the court finds that no genuine issues of material fact exist and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The defendants' motions for summary judgment are due to be granted. (Docs. 29, 32-33, 39).
The court will enter a separate Final Judgment.
Source: Leagle
