Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RUSSELL v. THOMAS, 11-00267-CG-B. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20120314725 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. `636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. Defendants' motion for more definite statement (Doc. 19) is hereby GRANTED. 1 The plaintiff is granted one final opportunity to file an amended complaint that gives the defen
More

ORDER

CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge.

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. `636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. Defendants' motion for more definite statement (Doc. 19) is hereby GRANTED.1 The plaintiff is granted one final opportunity to file an amended complaint that gives the defendants fair notice of her claims against them. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file her third amended complaint no later than March 20, 2012. It is further ORDERED that the parties' Rule 26(f) report of parties planning meeting shall be filed no later than March 27, 2012.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Defendant City of Mobile's Motion to Stay Report of the Parties Planning Meeting (Doc. 20) is deemed to be MOOT.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer