REEVES v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, 12-00006-KD-N. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120608946
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 22, 2012, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court and it is ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 5) be and are hereby GRANTED. 1 FootNotes 1.
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 22, 2012, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court and it is ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 5) be and are hereby GRANTED. 1 FootNotes 1. A..
More
ORDER
KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 22, 2012, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court and it is ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 5) be and are hereby GRANTED.1
FootNotes
1. According to Local Rule 7.3 of the Southern District of Alabama, "[a]ny party may request oral argument on any motion. However, the court may in its discretion rule on any motion without oral argument." Reeves requests oral argument on the defendant's motion to dismiss. However, the parties have provided sufficient information for the Court to decide the motion to dismiss and therefore oral argument is not necessary.
Source: Leagle
