KRUSE v. CORIZON, INC., 12-00212-WS-B. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130619872
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2013
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made (Docs. 125 & 126), the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Render a Default Judgment (Doc. 110) be DENI
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made (Docs. 125 & 126), the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Render a Default Judgment (Doc. 110) be DENIE..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made (Docs. 125 & 126), the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Render a Default Judgment (Doc. 110) be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
