BRADLEY v. U.S., 12-00624-WS-B. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140403668
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Bradley's petition for habeas corpus relief should be DENIED and that Bradley is not entitled to the issuance of a certificate of appealability or to
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Bradley's petition for habeas corpus relief should be DENIED and that Bradley is not entitled to the issuance of a certificate of appealability or to p..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Bradley's petition for habeas corpus relief should be DENIED and that Bradley is not entitled to the issuance of a certificate of appealability or to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
Source: Leagle
