GRIGGS v. PATTERSON, 12-00085-WS-B. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140423782
Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Griggs' habeas petition be DISMISSED as successive, in part, and barred by the statute of
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Griggs' habeas petition be DISMISSED as successive, in part, and barred by the statute of l..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Griggs' habeas petition be DISMISSED as successive, in part, and barred by the statute of limitations and that he is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, and consequently, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
