Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

AUST v. THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, LP, 13-00629-KD-B. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20140514a00 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 13, 2014
Latest Update: May 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) to which objection (Docs. 31-32) is made, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 25, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Mot
More

ORDER

KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge.

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) to which objection (Docs. 31-32) is made, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 25, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 8) is GRANTED and that this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama.1

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Thus, all other pending motions (Docs. 15, 20, 25) are MOOT.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer