WALLER v. U.S., 12-00138-WS-M. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20141030827
Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge. After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate (Doc. 42) be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Pe
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge. After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate (Doc. 42) be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Pet..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate (Doc. 42) be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be denied as he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
