HATCHER v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 14-0409-CG-C. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20141209598
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2014
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated November 21, 2014, is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated November 21, 2014, is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to t..
More
ORDER
CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated November 21, 2014, is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Dallas, County, Alabama, from whence it came.
Source: Leagle
