HAWKINS v. STEWART, 14-0328-KD-M. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150313831
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made (docs. 14, 18), the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made (docs. 14, 18), the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as h..
More
ORDER
KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made (docs. 14, 18), the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that this petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
