MILLER v. SPENCE, 14-00468-CG-B. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150424b60
Filed: Apr. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) (Doc. 40) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification be GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, and that Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaint
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) (Doc. 40) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification be GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, and that Defendants' Motion to Strike Plainti..
More
ORDER
CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (Doc. 40) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification be GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, and that Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplemental Evidentiary Submission be DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
