WILSON v. WHITTLE, 14-337-CB-M. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150519667
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 18, 2015
Latest Update: May 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr. , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendants Whittle, Franklin and Ezell are entitled to summary judgment in their favor on all claims asserted against them by Plaintiff, and that this a
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr. , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendants Whittle, Franklin and Ezell are entitled to summary judgment in their favor on all claims asserted against them by Plaintiff, and that this ac..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr., District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Defendants Whittle, Franklin and Ezell are entitled to summary judgment in their favor on all claims asserted against them by Plaintiff, and that this action against these Defendants be dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
