FRYE v. DUNN, 14-00192-CG-N. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150520b05
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 19, 2015
Latest Update: May 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and dated May 4, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and dated May 4, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the P..
More
ORDER
CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and dated May 4, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED, that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.1
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Petitioner's Motion for Report and Recommendation docketed October 7, 2014 (Doc. 7) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
