MICKELS v. U.S., 10-152-WS-B (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150701b23
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Mickels' habeas petition be DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Mickels' habeas petition be DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations a..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Mickels' habeas petition be DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations and that he is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, and consequently, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
