HANCOCK v. JONES, 14-0579-CB-M. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150701b27
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr. , Senior District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this petition be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Pe
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr. , Senior District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this petition be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Pet..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr., Senior District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that this petition be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that any certificate of appealability filed by Petitioner be DENIED as he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
