McREYNOLDS v. U.S., 12-00051-WS-N. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150729966
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and dated June 30, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED tha
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and dated June 30, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and dated June 30, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 210), as supplemented (Doc. 243), is DENIED, that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and that the Petitioner is found not entitled either to a Certificate of Appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
