GATES v. DANIELS, 15-0246-CG-N. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160323982
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , Senior District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated February 17, 2016, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. A
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , Senior District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated February 17, 2016, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Ac..
More
ORDER
CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, Senior District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated February 17, 2016, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Gates' superseding petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 4) is DENIED, that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and that Gates is not entitled to a certificate of appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
