Thomas v. Corizon, Inc., 15-248-WS-M. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160325d47
Visitors: 30
Filed: Mar. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, and Plaintiff's action be DISMISSED against all Defen
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, and Plaintiff's action be DISMISSED against all Defend..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, and Plaintiff's action be DISMISSED against all Defendants, with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
