Hopkins v. Gordy, 14-00528-WS-B. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160328448
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred and, furt
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred and, furth..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred and, further, that a certificate of appealability is hereby DENIED.
Source: Leagle
