MALONE v. JONES, 14-00571-WS-N. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20170103734
Visitors: 37
Filed: Dec. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner John Willie Malone, Jr.'s petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. 4) is DENIED and th
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner John Willie Malone, Jr.'s petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. 4) is DENIED and tha..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner John Willie Malone, Jr.'s petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 4) is DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, or to appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
