Lucy v. Cooks, CA 18-0218-WS-MU. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20181130822
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that William N. Lucy is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, because he has procedurally defaulted all his claims due to his failure to exhaust his state remedies and fairly present his constitutional claims to Alabama's Supreme Court. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition (Doc. 12) is DENIED and DISMISSED.
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that William N. Lucy is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, because he has procedurally defaulted all his claims due to his failure to exhaust his state remedies and fairly present his constitutional claims to Alabama's Supreme Court. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition (Doc. 12) is DENIED and DISMISSED. ..
More
JUDGMENT
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that William N. Lucy is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, because he has procedurally defaulted all his claims due to his failure to exhaust his state remedies and fairly present his constitutional claims to Alabama's Supreme Court. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition (Doc. 12) is DENIED and DISMISSED. Lucy is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
