Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Harris v. Brock, 19-0044-KD-MU. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20190327884 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated March 8, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff Phyllis Maria Harris cannot represent State Farm before this Court and, therefore, any claims she p
More

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated March 8, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff Phyllis Maria Harris cannot represent State Farm before this Court and, therefore, any claims she purports to pursue on State Farm's behalf are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and State Farm is hereby STRICKEN from the style of this action. The style of this case will appear in all future documents as follows: Phyllis Maria Harris, Plaintiff vs. Walter Lee Brock, et al., Defendants.

It is further ORDERED that Rev. Preston L. Scarbrough, a non-attorney, cannot represent Plaintiff Harris in this Court and, therefore, Harris' Appointment of Representative form naming Scarbrough as her representative (Doc. 5) is STRICKEN.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer