Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hill v. Davis, 1:18-cv-00287-JB-C. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20190329936 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK , District Judge . In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED Defendants Judge Davis and David Zimmerman's motions to dismiss, (Docs. 8 & 17), are GRANTED IN PART to the extent that this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and DENIED IN PART as to their other arguments, and Defendant Judge Davis's motion for Rule 11 sanctions, (Doc. 32), is GRANTED.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED Defendants Judge Davis and David Zimmerman's motions to dismiss, (Docs. 8 & 17), are GRANTED IN PART to the extent that this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and DENIED IN PART as to their other arguments, and Defendant Judge Davis's motion for Rule 11 sanctions, (Doc. 32), is GRANTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer