Horton v. Cochran, 18-00075-JB-B. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190425780
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's petition be dismissed without prejudice and that any motion for a Ce
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's petition be dismissed without prejudice and that any motion for a Cer..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's petition be dismissed without prejudice and that any motion for a Certificate of Appealability or for permission to appeal in forma pauperis be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
