Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Banks, 07-CR-00235-KD-B-2. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20190502d38 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Donald Banks' motion for early termination of supervised release. (Doc. 75). 1 The United States has responded to Banks' motion. (Doc. 78). It has no objection. ( Id. ). The United States Probation Office's opinion was solicited as well, and it similarly has no objection. For the following reasons, the motion is due to be granted. On April 13, 2009, after being convicted of conspiracy to possess with inten
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Donald Banks' motion for early termination of supervised release. (Doc. 75).1 The United States has responded to Banks' motion. (Doc. 78). It has no objection. (Id.). The United States Probation Office's opinion was solicited as well, and it similarly has no objection. For the following reasons, the motion is due to be granted.

On April 13, 2009, after being convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine, Banks received a 108-month custody sentence. (Doc. 51). Banks' sentence was later reduced to 70 months pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). (Doc. 61). The sentence included a 120-month term of supervised release. (Docs. 51 & 61). Banks was released from custody in June 2014, and he has served under supervised release since that time. To date, he has completed approximately 58 months (i.e., almost half) of his total term of supervised release.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1), after consideration of the relevant factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the Court may "terminate a term of supervised release and discharge the defendant released at any time after the expiration of one year of supervised release, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to the modification of probation, if it is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct of the defendant released and the interest of justice." 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). Factors to consider include the defendant's history and characteristics, deterrence to criminal conduct, protection of the public from future crimes by the defendant, and the need for educational training or other types of care in the most efficient manner. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (referencing § 3553(a) factors to be considered).

Banks writes that he has served his supervised release term with exemplary behavior and he has maintained employment. He writes that he is currently employed by H.O. Weavers and Sons, Inc.

Upon consideration of the relevant factors, Banks' steady employment, his adherence to the conditions of his supervised release, the Probation Office's agreement with the motion, and the United States' lack of objection, Banks' motion for early termination of supervised release (Doc. 75) is GRANTED.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Banks.

FootNotes


1. In December 2016, the Court denied Banks' previous motion for early termination of supervised release. (Doc. 74). At that time, he had completed approximately 30 months of his 120-month term of supervised release. Both the United States Probation Office and the United States Attorney's Office opposed his request for early termination. In denying Banks' motion, the Court noted that it would reconsider should a new motion be filed in a year. It has been more than two years since that order was entered.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer