Angulo v. U.S., 17-0017-WS-MU-3. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190621784
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and no objections having been filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's motion to vacate is GRANTED. In compliance with United States v. Phillips, 225 F.3d 1198 , 1201 (11
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and no objections having been filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's motion to vacate is GRANTED. In compliance with United States v. Phillips, 225 F.3d 1198 , 1201 (11 t..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and no objections having been filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's motion to vacate is GRANTED.
In compliance with United States v. Phillips, 225 F.3d 1198, 1201 (11th Cir. 2000), the criminal judgment entered on June 23, 2017 (Doc. 117) is VACATED. Judgment shall be re-entered by separate order in the criminal case for the sole purpose of allowing Petitioner to pursue his otherwise untimely appeal.1 Petitioner is advised that he must file any notice of appeal from the re-entered judgment within the fourteen-day period provided by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A)(i). Petitioner is also advised that he has the right to appeal and that, if he cannot afford a lawyer, upon motion, one will be appointed for him.2
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. No re-sentencing hearing is required, United States v. Parrish, 427 F.3d 1345, 1348 (11th Cir. 2005), and none will be held.
2. The petitioner's "successful motion to file an out-of-time notice of appeal is not to be counted as a first petition for the purposes of subsequent collateral proceedings." McIver v. United States, 307 F.3d 1327, 1329 (11th Cir. 2002).
Source: Leagle
