Hernandez-Esquivel v. United States, 17-037-WS-N. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190730925
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Movant Hernandez-Esquivel's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C.
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Movant Hernandez-Esquivel's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Movant Hernandez-Esquivel's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 46) is hereby DENIED, and that the Petitioner is found not entitled either to a Certificate of Appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
