Filed: Oct. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT CALLIE V.S. GRANADE , Senior District Judge . In accordance with the Order entered this date granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, City of Mobile, Alabama, Donald Pears, Thomas Calhoun, Charles Bailey, Wilbur Williams, and Mark Neno and against Plaintiff, George Martin. Plaintiff's 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S
Summary: JUDGMENT CALLIE V.S. GRANADE , Senior District Judge . In accordance with the Order entered this date granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, City of Mobile, Alabama, Donald Pears, Thomas Calhoun, Charles Bailey, Wilbur Williams, and Mark Neno and against Plaintiff, George Martin. Plaintiff's 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S...
More
JUDGMENT
CALLIE V.S. GRANADE, Senior District Judge.
In accordance with the Order entered this date granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, City of Mobile, Alabama, Donald Pears, Thomas Calhoun, Charles Bailey, Wilbur Williams, and Mark Neno and against Plaintiff, George Martin. Plaintiff's § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 489-90, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2374, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). Additionally, Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) as this Court will not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims.
DONE and ORDERED.
