JONES v. HOBBS, 2:10-cv-00202-JMM-JTK. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120113799
Visitors: 26
Filed: Jan. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff Jones' Motion for Order of Transfer, which this Court construes as a Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 79), is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff Jones' Motion for Order of Transfer, which this Court construes as a Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 79), is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED...
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff Jones' Motion for Order of Transfer, which this Court construes as a Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 79), is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
