Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BALES v. FARGUSON, 1:11-cv-70-DPM-BD. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120202945 Visitors: 184
Filed: Feb. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. Marshall Jr., District Judge. Neither Hood nor any other party has objected to Magistrate Judge Deere's recommended partial disposition, Document No. 39, and the Court sees no legal error or clear error on the face of the record in the proposal. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Court therefore adopts the proposed decision with one clarification: Hood's claims are dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered.

ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., District Judge.

Neither Hood nor any other party has objected to Magistrate Judge Deere's recommended partial disposition, Document No. 39, and the Court sees no legal error or clear error on the face of the record in the proposal. FED.

R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Court therefore adopts the proposed decision with one clarification: Hood's claims are dismissed without prejudice.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer