RIVERCLIFF COMPANY, INC. v. RESIDENCES AT RIVERDALE GP, LLC, 4:10CV00330 SWW (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120227469
Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. By order entered February 8, 2012, the Court gave the parties ten days in which to file objections to the Court's proposed action consolidating the above-captioned cases for the purpose of trial. No party has filed objections, and the cases are hereby consolidated for the purpose of trial only. Although it will be necessary to set a common trial date and corresponding deadlines for filing pretrial disclosures, the parties will continue to proceed acc
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. By order entered February 8, 2012, the Court gave the parties ten days in which to file objections to the Court's proposed action consolidating the above-captioned cases for the purpose of trial. No party has filed objections, and the cases are hereby consolidated for the purpose of trial only. Although it will be necessary to set a common trial date and corresponding deadlines for filing pretrial disclosures, the parties will continue to proceed acco..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
By order entered February 8, 2012, the Court gave the parties ten days in which to file objections to the Court's proposed action consolidating the above-captioned cases for the purpose of trial. No party has filed objections, and the cases are hereby consolidated for the purpose of trial only. Although it will be necessary to set a common trial date and corresponding deadlines for filing pretrial disclosures, the parties will continue to proceed according to the separate scheduling orders entered in each case. The cases will not merge into a single action, and the parties should continue to make filings in the separate cases.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
