U.S. v. SORENSEN, 4:09-CR-00163-01 BRW. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120316981
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge. I assessed the penalty against the Prosecution that I deemed appropriate under all of the circumstances, and do not intend to take additional action. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. Nos. 184, 185) is DENIED. As stated earlier, I might allow questioning of a witness about the deposition maneuvers under a spoliation theory; but I would have to be fully advised as to the premises re the law, and I am not yet fully advised in the premis
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge. I assessed the penalty against the Prosecution that I deemed appropriate under all of the circumstances, and do not intend to take additional action. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. Nos. 184, 185) is DENIED. As stated earlier, I might allow questioning of a witness about the deposition maneuvers under a spoliation theory; but I would have to be fully advised as to the premises re the law, and I am not yet fully advised in the premise..
More
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
I assessed the penalty against the Prosecution that I deemed appropriate under all of the circumstances, and do not intend to take additional action. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. Nos. 184, 185) is DENIED.
As stated earlier, I might allow questioning of a witness about the deposition maneuvers under a spoliation theory; but I would have to be fully advised as to the premises re the law, and I am not yet fully advised in the premises.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
