Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McLANE v. RICH TRANSPORT INC., 2:11CV00101 BSM. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120320811 Visitors: 29
Filed: Mar. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. Plaintiffs' motion to compel [Doc. No. 29] is granted. Although the evidence might not be admissible at trial, plaintiffs' discovery requests "appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). Furthermore, the minimal burden and expense this order will impose upon defendants weighs in favor of production. Id. at (b)(2)(C)(iii). Accordingly, defendants are hereby directed to produce, within thirty
More

ORDER

BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs' motion to compel [Doc. No. 29] is granted.

Although the evidence might not be admissible at trial, plaintiffs' discovery requests "appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). Furthermore, the minimal burden and expense this order will impose upon defendants weighs in favor of production. Id. at (b)(2)(C)(iii).

Accordingly, defendants are hereby directed to produce, within thirty days:

1. Campos's cell phone records for the time period of January 26, 2011, through

February 10, 2011, including incoming and outgoing calls and all text messages or any other data reflected on the bills for those dates; and

2. Campos's driver's logs and the graph grid required by 49 C.F.R. § 395.8(g)for the day of the collision on February 9, 2011, and for the preceding six months.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer