CARR v. ASTRUE, 2:12CV00046 BSM. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120323825
Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The complaint filed herein on March 15, 2012 [Doc. No. 2] is hereby dismissed. Plaintiff filed an identical complaint on May 12, 2011, bearing case number 2:11-CV-90, and assigned to the Honorable James M. Moody. The only distinction in the complaints is an obvious typographical error found in paragraph one of the original complaint. Because this case is merely a duplicate of case number 2:11-CV-90, it is appropriate for this case to be dismissed and for
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The complaint filed herein on March 15, 2012 [Doc. No. 2] is hereby dismissed. Plaintiff filed an identical complaint on May 12, 2011, bearing case number 2:11-CV-90, and assigned to the Honorable James M. Moody. The only distinction in the complaints is an obvious typographical error found in paragraph one of the original complaint. Because this case is merely a duplicate of case number 2:11-CV-90, it is appropriate for this case to be dismissed and for ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The complaint filed herein on March 15, 2012 [Doc. No. 2] is hereby dismissed. Plaintiff filed an identical complaint on May 12, 2011, bearing case number 2:11-CV-90, and assigned to the Honorable James M. Moody. The only distinction in the complaints is an obvious typographical error found in paragraph one of the original complaint. Because this case is merely a duplicate of case number 2:11-CV-90, it is appropriate for this case to be dismissed and for plaintiff to pursue relief in case number 2:11-CV-90, the first-filed case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
