Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

QUINN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 3:09-cv-26-DPM. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120402716 Visitors: 40
Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER D. P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Eight months ago, the Court granted Quinn's motion to dismiss some defendants without prejudice. The Court also put the rest of the case on hold based on Quinn's notice that she had settled with Ford and Jaguar, the remaining defendants. Document No. 81. The expected motion to dismiss from Quinn has not appeared. Quinn has informed the Court's staff that the parties' settlement has not fallen apart; but there was a longer-than-usual delay in quantif
More

ORDER

D. P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.

Eight months ago, the Court granted Quinn's motion to dismiss some defendants without prejudice. The Court also put the rest of the case on hold based on Quinn's notice that she had settled with Ford and Jaguar, the remaining defendants. Document No. 81. The expected motion to dismiss from Quinn has not appeared. Quinn has informed the Court's staff that the parties' settlement has not fallen apart; but there was a longer-than-usual delay in quantifying a Medicare lien (now done) and a delay in getting checks cut and settlement documents signed (now in the works). The case has lingered long enough. The Court therefore dismisses what is left of it with prejudice based on the parties' settlement, retaining jurisdiction until 30 April 2012 to adjudicate any settlement-related issues that need deciding.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer