HEFFERNAN v. HOBBS, 5:12CV00065 SWW. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120423541
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. After a careful review of the findings and recommendation, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. After a careful review of the findings and recommendation, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. After a careful review of the findings and recommendation, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by petitioner Robert Heffernan is dismissed because he failed to obtain the permission of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit before filing his petition. All requested relief is denied, and, in accordance with Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is denied. Judgment will be entered for respondent Ray Hobbs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
