KING v. T.C. OUTLAW, 2:11-cv-145-DPM-JTK. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120425b96
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. King has not objected to Magistrate Judge Kearney's recommendation, Document No. 39, that his complaint be dismissed. The Court sees no legal error or clear factual error in the proposal. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Court therefore adopts the proposed decision. Motions to dismiss, Document Nos. 24 & 34, granted. King's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered.
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
King has not objected to Magistrate Judge Kearney's recommendation, Document No. 39, that his complaint be dismissed. The Court sees no legal error or clear factual error in the proposal. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Court therefore adopts the proposed decision. Motions to dismiss, Document Nos. 24 & 34, granted. King's complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
