MICHALEK v. LUNSFORD, 4:11CV00685-JMM-JTR. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120425c06
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #33)
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #33) i..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #33) is DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Plaintiff's claims may proceed. Counsel will be appointed to represent him by separate Order.
3. The case will be removed from the trial docket the week of May 14, 2012.
Source: Leagle
