U.S. v. WARD, 4:11-cr-103-DPM-01. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120504d74
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 03, 2012
Latest Update: May 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court needs to clarify one point about Ward's plea. The United States also agreed that, upon acceptance of Ward's plea in this case, it would move to dismiss the indictment against Ward in Case No. 4:11-cr-104-SWW. This term is not included in the written agreement or the addendum. The parties informed the Court of it at the May 2nd plea hearing. The parties indicated that dismissal of the other indictment was a mutually agreed term of their agreem
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court needs to clarify one point about Ward's plea. The United States also agreed that, upon acceptance of Ward's plea in this case, it would move to dismiss the indictment against Ward in Case No. 4:11-cr-104-SWW. This term is not included in the written agreement or the addendum. The parties informed the Court of it at the May 2nd plea hearing. The parties indicated that dismissal of the other indictment was a mutually agreed term of their agreeme..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The Court needs to clarify one point about Ward's plea. The United States also agreed that, upon acceptance of Ward's plea in this case, it would move to dismiss the indictment against Ward in Case No. 4:11-cr-104-SWW. This term is not included in the written agreement or the addendum. The parties informed the Court of it at the May 2nd plea hearing. The parties indicated that dismissal of the other indictment was a mutually agreed term of their agreement in this case. With the parties' consent, the Court therefore enters this Order to be sure all of the mutual promises underlying the plea are of record.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
