AINLEY v. PERKINS, 5:11CV00282 BSM/HDY. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120507396
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 04, 2012
Latest Update: May 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering this document and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's motion for summ
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering this document and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's motion for summa..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering this document and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 22] is DENIED.
3. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
Source: Leagle
