JONES v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA, 3:11CV00172 JLH. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120514456
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 11, 2012
Latest Update: May 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion entered separately today, the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., is GRANTED. Document #17. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. If the Joneses wish to file an amended complaint, they should file a motion for leave to amend within thirty days from the entry of this Order. If they file such a motion, JPMorgan Chase Bank may respond within the time provided by Local Rule 7
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion entered separately today, the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., is GRANTED. Document #17. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. If the Joneses wish to file an amended complaint, they should file a motion for leave to amend within thirty days from the entry of this Order. If they file such a motion, JPMorgan Chase Bank may respond within the time provided by Local Rule 7...
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion entered separately today, the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., is GRANTED. Document #17. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. If the Joneses wish to file an amended complaint, they should file a motion for leave to amend within thirty days from the entry of this Order. If they file such a motion, JPMorgan Chase Bank may respond within the time provided by Local Rule 7.2. If a motion for leave to amend is not filed, the Court will assume that the Joneses have decided to stand on their pleadings and will enter final judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice, so that an appeal may be taken.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
