WHITE v. HOBBS, 5:10-cv-357-DPM-JTR. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120605c37
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's proposed findings and recommended disposition, Document No. 26, and White's objections and statement of necessity, Document Nos. 28 & 29. On de novo review, the Court adopts Judge Ray's proposal as its decision. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). White's petition for writ of habeas corpus, Document No.2, is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Court also denies a certificate of appealability
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's proposed findings and recommended disposition, Document No. 26, and White's objections and statement of necessity, Document Nos. 28 & 29. On de novo review, the Court adopts Judge Ray's proposal as its decision. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). White's petition for writ of habeas corpus, Document No.2, is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Court also denies a certificate of appealability b..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's proposed findings and recommended disposition, Document No. 26, and White's objections and statement of necessity, Document Nos. 28 & 29. On de novo review, the Court adopts Judge Ray's proposal as its decision. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). White's petition for writ of habeas corpus, Document No.2, is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Court also denies a certificate of appealability because White has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
