Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LEWIS v. BONNER, 3:11-cv-00181-JMM-JJV. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120702611 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge. On June 25 and June 28, 2012, documents mailed to Plaintiff at the address provided by the Plaintiff were returned as undeliverable as addressed. The Court has, through its own research, obtained a current address for Plaintiff. Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's June 13, 2012 Proposed Findings and Recommendations (#9) and the Court's June 13, 2012 Order (#8) finding service appropriate for Defe
More

ORDER

JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge.

On June 25 and June 28, 2012, documents mailed to Plaintiff at the address provided by the Plaintiff were returned as undeliverable as addressed. The Court has, through its own research, obtained a current address for Plaintiff. Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's June 13, 2012 Proposed Findings and Recommendations (#9) and the Court's June 13, 2012 Order (#8) finding service appropriate for Defendant Sprague to Plaintiff at his new address which is Arkansas Department of Correction, Tucker Unit, P.O. Box 240, Tucker, Arkansas 72168-0240.

Plaintiff is given up to, and including July 16, 2012, to file his objections to the pending Proposed Findings and Recommendations.

Plaintiff is reminded of Local Rule #5.5(c)(2) which states Rule 5.5(c)(2), which states:

Parties appearing pro se. It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer