Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TOWNSEND v. ASTRUE, 3:11-cv-00300-JJV. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120712740 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has filed a motion to remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (1995): The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. The Commissioner seeks remand for further development of the record and to issue a new decision. Defendant sta
More

ORDER

JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant has filed a motion to remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1995):

The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.

The Commissioner seeks remand for further development of the record and to issue a new decision. Defendant states that Plaintiff's attorney was contacted and stated that he had no objection to the requested remand. Under the circumstances, a sentence four remand is appropriate. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded for action consistent with this opinion. This is a "sentence four" remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer