MANNING v. NORRIS, 5:10CV00039 BSM/JTK. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120717744
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Manning's petition for
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Manning's petition for ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Manning's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. No. 2] be, and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice. The relief prayed for is denied.
2. A certificate of appealability will not be issued because Manning has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
