BOWERMAN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, 4:12-cv-156-DPM. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120718665
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. GSK is correct: this Court lacks jurisdiction to act at this point on the attorney's-fee issues. And Bowerman has not asked for any relief yet. The Court also agrees thatfee issues should be resolved, if necessary, by the MDL. The Court declines to strike Bowerman's notice, however, because the Court does not believe its present authority extends beyond deciding that it has no jurisdiction. So Ordered.
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
GSK is correct: this Court lacks jurisdiction to act at this point on the attorney's-fee issues. And Bowerman has not asked for any relief yet. The Court also agrees thatfee issues should be resolved, if necessary, by the MDL. The Court declines to strike Bowerman's notice, however, because the Court does not believe its present authority extends beyond deciding that it has no jurisdiction.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
