Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DESHAZER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 4:11CV00740 JMM. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120719665 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge. Pending are the Defendants' motion to stay, docket # 20 and Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the record, docket # 12. Defendants have advised the Court that they have determined that the Plaintiff should be placed "in benefit" meaning that he will receive back benefits and periodic benefit checks in accordance with the Plan. Further, Plaintiff's counsel has provided Defendants with an itemization of Plaintiff's attorneys fees and the parties are attempti
More

ORDER

JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge.

Pending are the Defendants' motion to stay, docket # 20 and Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the record, docket # 12. Defendants have advised the Court that they have determined that the Plaintiff should be placed "in benefit" meaning that he will receive back benefits and periodic benefit checks in accordance with the Plan. Further, Plaintiff's counsel has provided Defendants with an itemization of Plaintiff's attorneys fees and the parties are attempting to resolve this issue. Defendants request a sixty (60) day stay of this matter to allow the parties to work toward a final resolution of this case. For good cause shown, the motion to stay is GRANTED. In light of the Defendants' determination to pay benefits, Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the record is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refile as to any issues which remain unresolved following the stay of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer