Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WEAVER v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, 1:11CV0025 (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120806395 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge. Pending are Plaintiff's motions to vacate dismissal. (Docket # 31 and 32). For good cause shown, the motions are GRANTED. The Court's Order dated July 30, 2012 dismissing this case without prejudice is hereby vacated. The following conditions will be imposed: 1. The trial of this case will be continued to sometime in — other than April and May; 2. There will be no further discovery of Toyota other than of its expert witnesses; 3. Plaintiff will file an
More

ORDER

JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge.

Pending are Plaintiff's motions to vacate dismissal. (Docket # 31 and 32). For good cause shown, the motions are GRANTED. The Court's Order dated July 30, 2012 dismissing this case without prejudice is hereby vacated. The following conditions will be imposed:

1. The trial of this case will be continued to sometime in — other than April and May;

2. There will be no further discovery of Toyota other than of its expert witnesses;

3. Plaintiff will file an amended complaint identifying in detail his actual defect theories, to be supported by expert testimony, by August 21, 2012;

4. Plaintiff will produce his Rule 26 expert disclosures, including reports, by September 30, 2012;

5. Toyota will produce its Rule 26 expert disclosures, including reports, by November 15, 2012;

6. The discovery cutoff will be January 31, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer