SCOTT v. HOBBS, 2:12CV00090 BSM. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130612776
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 88] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgmen
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 88] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge
The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 88] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 75) is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.
2. All pending motions are denied as moot.
2. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order and the accompanying judgment is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
Source: Leagle
