Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SCOTT v. HOBBS, 2:12CV00090 BSM. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130612776 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 88] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgmen
More

ORDER

BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge

The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 88] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 75) is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

2. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order and the accompanying judgment is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer